Modelo integrador de competitividad para PYMEs: asociatividad, inteligencia Estratégica y transformación digital

Main Article Content

Luis Héctor Perego
Silvia Alejandra Marteau

Abstract

SMEs in contexts such as Argentina operate under a challenging combination: high macroeconomic volatility and technology that arrives late, is expensive, or simply never arrives at all. This article proposes a model that integrates four variables: territorial association, value chain positioning, management training, and strategic intelligence, as interdependent dimensions, as addressing them in isolation is precisely what fails to yield results. The research combines narrative literature review with action research. Fieldwork was conducted in Greater La Plata: interventions were conducted with the region's SME Consortium, which brings together over 54 professionals and a growing group of industrial firms, alongside a longitudinal study of Radha Colors between December 2024 and January 2026. The data reveals that technological gaps are not closed through isolated operational improvements. Sustained change is driven by the organization's capacity to absorb external knowledge and transform it into its own practices. In the documented cases, university collaboration was the channel through which knowledge and technology flowed (resources these companies could not have generated on their own), resulting in tangible gains in productivity and their standing within the value chain.

Article Details

How to Cite
Perego, L. H., & Marteau, S. A. (2026). Modelo integrador de competitividad para PYMEs: asociatividad, inteligencia Estratégica y transformación digital. Ingenio Tecnológico, 8, e085. Retrieved from https://ingenio.frlp.utn.edu.ar/index.php/ingenio/article/view/182
Section
Artículos

References

Acosta Santos, A. A. (2025). Pequeñas y medianas empresas, cadenas globales de valor. Revista 360 Gestión, 12(4), 45–62.

Bianchini, M., y Sancho, M. L. (2025). SME digitalisation for competitiveness: The 2025 OECD D4SME Survey. OECD SME and Entrepreneurship Papers, No. 43. París: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/197e3077-en

Cortés-Palacios, H. A. (2023). ¿Cómo la capacidad de absorción afecta la innovación frugal de las PYMEs manufactureras? Innovar, 33(87), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v33n87.105423

Emmanuel, I. E. (2023). Managerial competencies and small business venture performance: An emerging economies perspective. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 30(2), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-05-2022-0231

Esser, K., Hillebrand, W., Messner, D., y Meyer-Stamer, J. (1996). Competitividad sistémica: nuevo desafío para las empresas y la política. Revista de la CEPAL, 59, 39–52. https://hdl.handle.net/11362/12025

Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action. Londres: Routledge.

International Trade Centre – ITC. (2017). Guía para las PYMEs sobre las cadenas de valor. Ginebra: ITC. Recuperado de https://www.intracen.org/es/recursos/publicaciones/guia-para-las-PYMEs-sobre-las-cadenas-de-valor

Kemmis, S., y McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. En N. K. Denzin y Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3.ª ed., pp. 559–603). SAGE Publications.

Marteau, S. A. (2022). Propuesta para Fortalecer las Competencias Administrativas de los Directivos de las Unidades Ejecutoras de I+D. El caso de la UNLP-CONICET. Tesis de Doctorado en Ciencias de la Administración. Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina.

Mashau, M. J., Nenzhelele, E. T., y Ramasimu, N. F. (2025). Framework for competitive intelligence implementation by SMEs: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy, 7(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v7i6.922

Méndez-Isla, M. (2024). Studying University-Industry Collaboration in Latin America. Memoria Académica, Universidad Nacional de La Plata. https://doi.org/10.24215/18539912e088

Microsoft Latin America. (2025). Encuesta PYMEs 2025: 54% de las PYMEs en las Américas usa IA [Informe corporativo de mercado]. Recuperado de https://news.microsoft.com/source/latam/noticias-de-microsoft/encuesta-PYMEs-2025-54-de-las-PYMEs-en-las-americas-usa-ia/

Oliveira, J. P., y Lima Rua, O. (2024). Innovation of ecosystems and open innovation on micro-enterprises. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(2), 100443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100443

Ortigueira-Sánchez, L. C. (2020). The Impact of Absorptive Capacity on Innovation in Peru. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 15(4), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242020000400019

Perego, L. H., y Marteau, S. A. (2007). Integración de Cadenas Productivas de Valor. Eumed.

https://www.eumed.net/ce/2007c/Directrices%20para%20la%20Integracion%20de%20Cadenas%20Productivas%20de%20Valor.pdf

Perego, L. H., y Marteau, S. A. (2026). Transformación tecnológica y organizacional en PYMEs: estudio de caso de Radha Colors. Ingenio Tecnológico, 8, e076. https://portal.amelica.org/ameli/journal/266/2665532011/

Perego, L. H., y Miguel, R. S. (2014). Innovación e Inteligencia Estratégica: Transformando Información en Conocimiento. Málaga: Servicios Académicos Internacionales para eumed.net.

Perego, L. H., Marteau, S. A., Leskiw, G. R., y Petrullo, E. (2024). Resumen Estratégico Consorcio PYME del Gran La Plata: Una Propuesta para el Futuro Productivo de la Región. Documento de Trabajo Institucional. La Plata: Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Facultad Regional La Plata.

Sancho-Zamora, R., Hernández-Perlines, C., y Peña-García, I. (2022). The Impact of Absorptive Capacity on Innovation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 814049. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.814049

Vallejo-Imbaquingo, R. (2025). The Role of Latin American Universities in Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Administrative Sciences, 15(3), 108. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15030108

Zahara, Z. (2024). Competitive Advantage as Mediating Role to Enhance MSMEs Performance. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 34(2), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.53703/001c.121131